I guess that during past one hundred years a lot of things had changed and thus maybe we, as a society, should change couple of "standards".
1) We are much taller as a species
- The beds and doors which are 2metres long feel like they should be a bit bigger
- the kitchen tables, where you prepare your food, should be higher than 85 cm, cause now you just bend like an asshole and your back starts to hurt during meal preparation
2) we are getting married much older
- all those anniversaries called after something precious should be changed a bit. Silver wedding is nowadays 25 yrs, pearl wedding is 30 yrs, golden wedding is 50 yrs, diamond wedding is 70 yrs. OK the trend is now that people are getting married and have kids around 30 yrs of age. Who the hell could celebrate the diamond wedding?? I dont know many 100yrs old people around here.
If I come across any other things that should be changed, I would write them down.
Saturday, 5 December 2009
Thursday, 12 November 2009
2220
OK so this was on my mind since I was a little kid. Take a calculator and:
123+369+987+741=2220
147+789+963+321=2220
159+357+753+951=2220
456+258+852+654=2220
Weird, huh? Circles and crosses (+ and x) on a numpad/calculator sum up as 2220.
123+369+987+741=2220
147+789+963+321=2220
159+357+753+951=2220
456+258+852+654=2220
Weird, huh? Circles and crosses (+ and x) on a numpad/calculator sum up as 2220.
Monday, 25 May 2009
Stupid maddness about Susan Boyle
Message to all those millions of people who shit their pants for tremendous Susan Boyle.
In the 1960s and 1970s it was totally OK to look like your mother had you with a horse and have a bad hair and terrible teeth, and yet you could have been a music star!
It is just the last twenty years when we all suddenly started to look at the appearances first (mainly television caused this shift), so only in last decade most of the new singers look like supermodels, i.e. they are televisual first, any musical accomplishments are added later in post-production.
In this logic I totally do not get this maddness about Susan Boyle. OK, she sings good, no doubt about that. But narrate this story in a sense: "Look at her! She is uglier than monkey's shit, and yet (heureka!) she is able to sing! What a tremendous acomplishment for the lesser mind!"
This whole story is based on the stereotype, that if you are ugly as fuck, you cannot do anything in the world. But history, and mostly history of the music prove these people wrong. Look at the Beatles for instance - Ringo Starr is probably uglier than Susan Boyle and yet everybody loves Beatles!
In the 1960s and 1970s it was totally OK to look like your mother had you with a horse and have a bad hair and terrible teeth, and yet you could have been a music star!
It is just the last twenty years when we all suddenly started to look at the appearances first (mainly television caused this shift), so only in last decade most of the new singers look like supermodels, i.e. they are televisual first, any musical accomplishments are added later in post-production.
In this logic I totally do not get this maddness about Susan Boyle. OK, she sings good, no doubt about that. But narrate this story in a sense: "Look at her! She is uglier than monkey's shit, and yet (heureka!) she is able to sing! What a tremendous acomplishment for the lesser mind!"
This whole story is based on the stereotype, that if you are ugly as fuck, you cannot do anything in the world. But history, and mostly history of the music prove these people wrong. Look at the Beatles for instance - Ringo Starr is probably uglier than Susan Boyle and yet everybody loves Beatles!
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
Mijn newe tee-シャツ (Part 2)
Actually I have a smile on my face, but is quite funny though blue colour would be better, haha. But I like it anyway. So nobody please dont give me this t-shirt as a wedding gifts, I have already one at home ;o).
Friday, 1 May 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
